Download Free PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Real Exam Questions Download
Latest PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Real Exam Dumps PDF
NEW QUESTION # 142
您正在一家名為 ABC 的提供醫療保健服務的住宅療養院進行 ISMS 審核。
審核計劃的下一步是驗證 ABC 醫療保健行動應用程式開發、支援和生命週期流程的資訊安全性。在審核過程中，您了解到該組織將行動應用程式開發外包給了一家具有 CMMI 5 級、ITSM（ISO
/IEC
20000-1)、BCMS (ISO 22301) 和 ISMS (ISO/IEC 27001) 認證。 IT經理介紹了軟體安全管理流程，並將流程總結如下：
行動應用程式開發至少應採用「設計安全」和「預設安全」原則。應具備以下個人資料保護安全功能：
存取控制。
個人資料加密，即高階加密標準（AES）演算法，金鑰長度：256位元；個人資料假名化。
已檢查漏洞，無安全後門
您可以獲得最新的行動應用測試報告樣本 - 詳細資訊如下：
您詢問 IT 經理，為什麼組織仍在使用行動應用程序，而個人資料加密和假名化測試卻失敗了。此外，服務經理是否有權批准測試。
IT經理解釋說，根據軟體安全管理程序，測試結果應由他批准。加密和假名功能失敗的原因是這些功能嚴重降低了系統和服務效能。額外的
需要 150% 的資源來實現這一點。服務經理同意存取控制足夠好並且可以接受。這就是服務經理簽署批准書的原因。
您對醫務人員的手機進行採樣，發現 ABC 的醫療保健行動應用程式版本
1.01 已安裝。你發現1.01版本沒有測試記錄。
IT經理解釋說，由於勒索軟體攻擊頻繁，外包行動應用開發公司對受測軟體進行了免費小幅更新，並對更新後的軟體進行了緊急發布，並口頭保證不會對安全造成任何影響。以他20年的資訊安全經驗來看，沒有必要重新測試。
您正在準備審核結果 請選擇兩個正確的選項。
- A. 不存在不合格項 (NC)。 IT 經理展現了良好的領導能力。 （與條款相關
5.1，控制5.4） - B. 存在不合格項 (NC)。組織不控制計劃的變更並審查非預期變更的後果。 （與第8.1條相關）
- C. 還有改進的機會 (OI)。該組織根據其提供的免費服務的範圍選擇外部服務提供者。 （與第 8.1 條相關，控制措施 A.5.21）
- D. 還有改進的機會 (OI)。 IT 經理應根據適當的測試做出是否繼續提供服務的決定。 （與第 8.1 條相關，控制措施 A.8.30）
- E. 不存在不合格項 (NC)。 IT 經理證明他完全有能力。 （與第7.2條相關）
- F. 存在不合格項 (NC)。 IT。管理者不遵守軟體安全管理程序。 （與第 8.1 條相關，控制措施 A.8.30）
Answer: B,F
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001, organizations must control planned changes and review the consequences of unintended changes in order to ensure continued alignment with information security requirements. In this scenario, the organization failed to perform appropriate testing after an emergency update to the mobile app, which constitutes a nonconformity with clause 8.1 of the standard.
**References**:
- ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Reference Materials
- PECB Candidate Handbook for ISO 27001 Lead Auditor
ISO/IEC 27001 requires that organizations adhere to their established procedures for software security management. The IT Manager's approval of the app despite failed security tests and lack of proper documentation for the new version indicates noncompliance with the procedure, thus reflecting a nonconformity.
**References**:
- ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Reference Materials
- PECB Candidate Handbook for ISO 27001 Lead Auditor
NEW QUESTION # 143
下列敘述中哪兩項是正確的？
- A. 該組織不得將審查立法環境以確保遵守法律法規的任務外包。
- B. 作為認證機構審核的一部分，審核員負責核實組織的合法合規狀態。
- C. 在認證機構審核期間，審核員應確保保留文件訊息，以確定組織必須遵守的法律法規。
- D. 在第三方審計期間，審計員會評估組織如何確保其了解法律要求的變更。
- E. 認證機構審核員的角色包括評估組織的流程，以確保其符合法律要求。
- F. 組織只需遵守與其資訊安全管理系統直接相關的法律法規。
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
From Exact Extract:
Explanation for B (True):
This statement is true because ISO 27001 requires an organization to establish processes for identifying, reviewing, and complying with applicable legal, statutory, regulatory, and contractual obligations. A key part of this is being aware of changes to these requirements to maintain ongoing compliance. An auditor's role is to verify that the organization has such a process in place and that it is effective.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Clause 6.1.3 "Information security risk treatment": While not directly stating "legal requirements," this clause implies that the organization must determine controls to treat information security risks, and compliance with legal requirements is a significant risk factor.
ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Annex A.5.31 "Legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements": This control states: "The organization should identify, document, and comply with relevant legal, statutory, regulatory, and contractual requirements related to information security." This inherently includes processes for staying aware of changes.
ISO/IEC 27002:2022, 5.31 (Guidance for A.5.31): Provides more detail, emphasizing the need for processes to "identify all relevant legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements, and to ensure that appropriate action is taken to comply with these requirements." This explicitly includes monitoring for changes.
ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.1.2 "Audit objectives": An audit objective is to determine "the ability of the management system to ensure the client meets applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements." This necessarily involves checking the process for identifying changes.
Explanation for E (True):
ISO 27001 mandates the retention of documented information for various aspects of the ISMS, including the identification of legal requirements. Auditors will look for evidence that the organization has indeed identified and documented the applicable legislation it needs to comply with.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Clause 7.5.1 "General," 7.5.2 "Creating and updating documented information," and
7.5.3 "Control of documented information": These clauses generally require documented information to be maintained and retained as specified by the standard.
ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Annex A.5.31 "Legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements": As mentioned above, this control explicitly states that the organization should "identify, document, and comply with relevant legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements." The term "document" directly implies
"documented information is retained."
ISO/IEC 27002:2022, 5.31 (Guidance for A.5.31): Further elaborates that the identified requirements should be documented and kept up to date.
Explanation for A (False):
The organization is required to comply with all applicable legal, statutory, and regulatory requirements, as well as contractual obligations. Information security often intersects with broader legal frameworks (e.g., data protection, privacy, industry-specific regulations) that may not directly relate to the ISMS in a narrow sense, but are critical to the organization's overall compliance and its information security posture.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Annex A.5.31 "Legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements": This control does not limit compliance to only what "directly relates" but to "relevant" requirements. The scope of
"relevant" is determined by the organization's context, operations, and information it handles.
Explanation for C (False):
Organizations can and often do outsource tasks like legal environment reviews to specialized legal firms or subscribe to legal compliance services. The ISO 27001 standard does not prohibit outsourcing. However, the organization remains ultimately accountable for ensuring that these outsourced processes meet the requirements of the ISMS and that legal compliance is maintained. The auditor would verify the organization's oversight of such outsourced activities.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Clause 8.1 "Operational planning and control": This clause states that organizations should "control planned changes and review the consequences of unintended changes, taking action to mitigate any adverse effects" and "ensure that outsourced processes are controlled." This implicitly allows outsourcing but requires control.
Explanation for D (False):
A certification body auditor's role is not to act as a legal compliance officer or to definitively verify the organization's actual legal compliance status (i.e., whether they are perfectly compliant with every law). That responsibility lies with the organization itself, often supported by its legal counsel. The auditor's role is to verify that the organization has established, implemented, and maintains an effective process for identifying, managing, and complying with legal requirements as required by ISO 27001. They audit the management system's approach to compliance, not the legal compliance outcome itself.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.1.2 "Audit objectives": States that the audit is to determine "the ability of the management system to ensure the client meets applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements." It does not state the auditor's role is to legally verify compliance.
ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Introduction: Emphasizes that the standard specifies requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving an ISMS, not for guaranteeing absolute legal compliance outside the scope of the ISMS processes.
Explanation for F (This statement is generally aligned with the role, but less precise as a 'sole true' statement compared to B and E):
While this statement is generally true about the auditor's role, its phrasing "to ensure compliance with their legal requirements" can be misinterpreted. As explained for D, the auditor evaluates the processes designed to achieve compliance, not the absolute legal compliance itself. However, in the context of multiple-choice questions where you pick the "most true" statements, it conveys a similar intent to B, but B and E are more precise regarding specific auditor actions and ISMS requirements. Given B and E are unequivocally true as specific audit actions/requirements, they are the stronger correct answers.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.1.2 "Audit objectives": As noted before, the audit objective includes evaluating the management system's ability to meet requirements. This aligns with evaluating processes.
NEW QUESTION # 144
情境 4：SendPay 是一家金融公司，透過代理商和金融機構網路提供服務。他們的主要服務之一是在全球範圍內轉帳。 SendPay 作為一家新公司，致力於為客戶提供最優質的服務。由於該公司提供國際交易，因此要求客戶提供個人信息，例如身份、交易原因以及完成交易可能需要的其他詳細信息。因此，SendPay 已實施安全措施來保護客戶的訊息，包括偵測、調查和回應可能出現的任何資訊安全威脅。他們對提供安全服務的承諾也體現在 ISMS 實施過程中，該公司投入了大量時間和資源。
去年，SendPay 推出了他們的數位平台，允許透過智慧型手機或筆記型電腦等電子設備進行貨幣交易，而無需支付額外費用。透過這個平台，SendPay 的客戶可以隨時隨地發送和接收資金。該數位平台幫助SendPay簡化了公司營運並進一步拓展了業務。當時SendPay正在外包其軟體業務，因此該專案是由外包公司的軟體開發團隊完成的。
該團隊還負責維護 SendPay 的技術基礎設施。
最近，該公司在實施 ISMS 近一年後申請了 ISO/IEC 27001 認證。他們與符合其標準的認證機構簽訂了合約。不久之後，認證機構任命了一個由四名審核員組成的團隊來審核 SendPay 的 ISMS。
審計過程中，發現以下情況：
1.外包軟體公司在未事先通知的情況下終止了與SendPay的合約。結果，SendPay 無法立即將服務恢復到內部，其營運中斷了五天。審計人員要求 SendPay 的代表提供證據，證明他們在合約終止的情況下有計劃遵循。這些代表沒有提供任何書面證據，但在接受審計時，他們告訴審計人員，SendPay的高層已經確定了另外兩家軟體開發公司，如果類似情況再次發生，可以立即提供服務。
2. 沒有證據顯示對外包給軟體開發公司的活動進行了監控。 SendPay 的代表再次告訴審計人員，他們定期與軟體開發公司溝通，並適當地告知可能發生的任何變更。
3.防火牆測試未發現異常狀況。審核員測試了防火牆配置，以確定這些服務提供的安全等級。他們使用資料包分析器來測試防火牆策略，這使他們能夠即時檢查發送或接收的資料包。
根據該場景，回答以下問題：
為什麼SendPay在合約終止後無法恢復內部服務？請參閱場景 4。
- A. 因為外包軟體公司在沒有事先通知的情況下終止了與SendPay的合約
- B. 因為SendPay沒有監控外包軟體營運的技術基礎設施
- C. 因為 SendPay 缺乏全面的業務連續性計劃，存在合約終止的潛在影響
Answer: C
Explanation:
SendPay's inability to restore their services immediately after the contract termination indicates a lack of a comprehensive business continuity plan that addresses the potential impacts of such terminations. This oversight can result in significant operational disruptions, as observed.
NEW QUESTION # 145
場景 2：Knight 是一家來自美國北加州的電子公司，開發電玩遊戲機。 Knight 在全球擁有 300 多名員工。在成立五週年之際，他們決定推出 G-Console，這是一款面向全球市場的新一代電玩遊戲機。 G-Console被認為是2021年的終極媒體機，將為玩家帶來最佳的遊戲體驗。
主機包將包括一副 VR 耳機、兩個
遊戲和其他禮物。
多年來，公司透過誠信、誠實和尊重客戶而建立了良好的聲譽。這種良好的聲譽是大多數熱衷遊戲玩家在Knight的G-console一上市就想擁有它的原因之一。
Knight 除了是一家非常以客戶為導向的公司之外，
也因其開發品質獲得了遊戲產業的廣泛認可。他們的價格比合理標準允許的要高一些。
儘管如此，對於 Knight 的大多數忠實客戶來說，這並不是一個問題，因為它們的品質是一流的。
作為世界頂級視訊遊戲機開發商之一，Knight 也經常成為惡意活動的焦點。該公司的 ISMS 已投入運作一年多了。 ISMS 範圍包括 Knight 的所有部門（財務和人力資源部門除外）。
最近，奈特的一些包含專有資訊的文件被駭客洩露。 Knight 的事件回應團隊 (IRT) 立即開始分析系統的每個部分以及事件的詳細資訊。
IRT 的第一個懷疑是 Knight 的員工使用了弱密碼，因此很容易被未經授權存取其帳戶的駭客破解。然而，在仔細調查該事件後，IRT 確定駭客透過擷取檔案傳輸協定 (FTP) 流量來存取帳戶。
FTP 是一種用於在帳戶之間傳輸檔案的網路協定。它使用明文密碼進行身份驗證。
受此資訊安全事件的影響，在IRT的建議下，Knight決定用Secure Shell (SSH)協定取代FTP，這樣任何捕獲流量的人都只能看到加密的資料。
在這些變化之後，奈特進行了風險評估，以驗證控制措施的實施是否已將類似事件的風險降至最低。該過程的結果得到了 ISMS 專案經理的批准，他聲稱實施新控制措施後的風險等級符合公司的風險接受程度。
根據該場景，回答以下問題：
根據情境2，ISMS 專案經理批准了風險評估結果。這是可以接受的嗎？
- A. 是，風險處理後剩餘的風險應得到ISMS專案經理的批准
- B. 否，風險處理後剩餘的風險應在任何階段得到最高管理層的批准
- C. 否，實施 ISMS 新控制措施後剩餘的風險應得到 ISMS 團隊的批准
Answer: B
Explanation:
In the context of ISO/IEC 27001, the approval of the risk assessment and the acceptance of the remaining risk levels after treatment are typically responsibilities of the top management. This is because top management is accountable for the information security management system and its outcomes, and they have the authority to accept risks on behalf of the organization12. References: = The information provided is based on the standard practices of ISO/IEC 27001 risk assessment and treatment processes, which emphasize the role of top management in the approval and acceptance of risks
NEW QUESTION # 146
場景9：UpNet是一家網路公司，已通過ISO/IEC 27001認證。
自從獲得 ISO/IEC 27001 認證以來，該公司的認可度大幅提高。此認證證實了 UpNefs 營運的成熟性及其符合廣泛認可和接受的標準。
但認證之後一切還沒結束。 UpNet 透過進行內部稽核不斷審查和增強其安全控制以及 ISMS 的整體有效性和效率。高階主管不願意聘請全職內部稽核團隊，因此決定將內部稽核職能外包。這種形式的內部稽核確保了獨立性、客觀性，並且在 ISMS 的持續改進方面發揮諮詢作用。
在初次認證審核後不久，該公司創建了一個專門從事數據和儲存產品的新部門。他們提供針對資料中心和基於軟體的網路設備（例如網路虛擬化和網路安全設備）進行最佳化的路由器和交換器。這導致 ISMS 認證範圍內已涵蓋的其他部門的營運發生變化。
所以。 UpNet 啟動了風險評估流程和內部稽核。根據內部審計結果，公司確認了現有和新流程和控制的有效性和效率。
由於新部門符合 ISO/IEC 27001 要求，最高管理層決定將其納入認證範圍。 UpNet宣布取得ISO/IEC 27001認證，認證範圍涵蓋全公司。
在初次認證審核一年後，認證機構對 UpNefs ISMS 進行了另一次審核。
此次審核旨在確定 UpNefs ISMS 是否符合指定的 ISO/IEC 27001 要求，並確保 ISMS 持續改善。審核小組確認，經過認證的 ISMS 繼續符合標準的要求。儘管如此，新部門對管理體系的治理產生了重大影響。此外，認證機構並未獲悉任何變更。因此，UpNefs認證被暫停。
根據上述場景，回答以下問題：
UpNet宣布ISMS認證範圍涵蓋整個公司，確保新部門也符合ISO/IEC 27001要求。您如何對場景 9 所示的情況進行分類？
- A. 不可接受，延期審核應由內部審核員而非最高管理階層批准
- B. 可接受，內部稽核確認了現有和新流程和控制的有效性和效率
- C. 不可接受，UpNet 應在發佈公告之前請求並批准延期審核
Answer: C
Explanation:
This situation is unacceptable because UpNet should have requested and been granted an extension audit prior to announcing that the ISMS certification scope encompasses the whole company, including the new department. Proper procedures need to be followed to extend the certification to additional departments or processes.
NEW QUESTION # 147
下列哪兩項工作文件不是認證審核員進行審核計畫時所需要的？
- A. IT經理的職業經歷
- B. 一份清單
- C. 組織的財務報表
- D. 外部提供者列表
- E. 範例計劃
- F. 審計計劃
Answer: A,C
Explanation:
Audit planning for certification audits is defined by ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.3 (Preparing audit activities) and ISO/IEC 27006.
Key audit planning documents include:
* Audit plan (mandatory, prepared by team leader)
* Checklists (supporting tool for consistency and coverage of requirements)
* List of external providers (required to check compliance with ISO/IEC 27001 Annex A.5.19 - supplier relationships and A.5.20 - supplier agreements)
* Sample plans (used when sampling evidence across sites, processes, or records is needed, especially in Stage 2 audits) However, the following are not required:
* B. Career history of the IT manager - Personnel competence may be verified during interviews and evidence review, but an auditor does not need career histories as part of audit planning. ISO 19011 only requires access to competence records if needed but not CVs.
* F. Organisation's financial statement - Financial performance is not part of ISMS audit planning unless it relates to identified risks or contractual obligations. ISO/IEC 27001 focuses on information security risks, not financial audit compliance.
ISO 19011:2018 (clause 6.3.2) clearly defines the required planning inputs as:
* Audit objectives, scope, and criteria
* Audit team roles and responsibilities
* Allocation of resources
* Information about the auditee's ISMS (e.g., documented scope, processes, external provider relationships, relevant legal/regulatory requirements) There is no mention of personnel CVs or financial statements being required.
Final Correct Answer: B and F
References:
ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.3 (Preparing audit activities)
ISO/IEC 27006:2015, section 9.2 (Audit planning requirements for ISMS certification bodies)
NEW QUESTION # 148
場景 2：
Clinic 成立於 20 世紀 90 年代，是一家專門治療心臟相關疾病和複雜外科手術的醫療器材公司。該公司總部位於歐洲，為患者和醫療保健專業人士提供服務。診所收集患者數據以客製化治療方案、監測結果並改善設備功能。為了增強資料安全性和建立信任，Clinic 正在實施基於 ISO/IEC 27001 的資訊安全管理系統 (ISMS)。
診所僅透過考慮內部問題、介面、內部和外包活動之間的依賴關係以及相關方的期望來確定其 ISMS 的範圍。此範圍已仔細記錄並可供查閱。在定義其 ISMS 時，Clinic 選擇專注於關鍵部門內的關鍵流程，例如研發、病患資料管理和客戶支援。
儘管最初面臨挑戰，Clinic 仍然致力於實施 ISMS，並根據其獨特需求量身定制安全控制。專案團隊從 ISO/IEC 27001 中排除了某些附件 A 控制，同時加入了額外的特定產業控制以增強安全性。該團隊根據內部和外部因素評估了這些控制的適用性，最終制定了全面的適用性聲明 (SoA)，詳細說明了控制選擇和實施背後的理由。
隨著認證準備工作的進展，被任命為團隊負責人的 Brian 採用了自我導向的風險評估方法來識別和評估公司的策略問題和安全實踐。這種積極主動的方法確保診所的風險評估與其目標和使命保持一致。
根據情境 2，Brian 選擇哪一種方法來進行風險評估？
- A. 八度
- B. EBIOS
- C. 梅哈里
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
A . OCTAVE (Operationally Critical Threat, Asset, and Vulnerability Evaluation) - Correct Answer. OCTAVE is a self-directed risk assessment methodology where organizations identify, evaluate, and manage information security risks based on their strategic objectives, aligning with Brian's approach.
B . MEHARI is a quantitative risk analysis method, not self-directed.
C . EBIOS is focused on regulatory compliance and external risk factors, which Brian's methodology did not emphasize.
Thus, Brian's approach aligns best with OCTAVE, as it is self-directed and focuses on organizational security practices.
NEW QUESTION # 149
您正在一家提供醫療保健服務的住宅療養院進行 ISMS 審核。審核計畫的下一步是驗證資訊安全事件管理流程。 IT 安全經理介紹了資訊安全事件管理程序（文件參考 ID：ISMS_L2_16，版本 4），並解釋此流程基於 ISO/IEC 27035-1:2016。
您查看該文件並注意到一條聲明「任何資訊安全弱點、事件和事故應在識別後 1 小時內報告給聯絡人 (PoC)」。在訪問員工時，您發現大家對「弱點、事件、事件」意義的理解有差異。
IT安全經理解釋說，6個月前舉辦了一次線上「資訊安全應對」培訓研討會。所有受訪者均參與並通過了報告練習和課程評估。
您正在準備審計結果。選擇兩個正確的選項。
- A. 沒有不合格項。報告資訊安全弱點、事件和事故。
這符合第 9.1 條和控制措施 A.5.24。 - B. 還有改進的機會 (OFI)。提高資訊安全事件訓練效果。這與第 7.2 條和控制措施 A.6.3 相關。
- C. 存在不合格項 (NC)。資訊安全事件培訓失敗。這不符合第 7.2 條和控制措施 A.6.3。
- D. 沒有不合格項。資訊安全處置訓練卓有成效。這符合第 7.2 條和控制措施 A.6.3。
- E. 存在不合格項 (NC)。事件管理報告流程的術語不明確，員工對「弱點、事件和事件」意義的誤解證明了這一點。這不符合第 9.1 條和控制措施 A.5.24。
- F. 有改進的機會 (OFI)。報告資訊安全弱點、事件和事件。這與第 9.1 條和控制措施 A.5.24 有關。
Answer: B,E
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 clause 7.2, the organization must ensure that the persons doing work under its control are aware of the information security policy, their contribution to the effectiveness of the ISMS, the implications of not conforming to the ISMS requirements, and the benefits of improved information security performance. The organization must also provide information security awareness education and training to its personnel and relevant interested parties. According to control A.6.3, the organization must ensure that all employees and contractors are made aware of the information security incident management procedures and their expected roles and responsibilities. Therefore, an opportunity for improvement (OFI) can be identified if the information security incident training effectiveness can be improved, as evidenced by the differences in the understanding of the meaning of "weakness, event, and incident" among the staff.
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 clause 9.1, the organization must monitor, measure, analyze and evaluate the information security performance and the effectiveness of the ISMS. The organization must also retain appropriate documented information as evidence of the monitoring and measurement results. According to control A.5.24, the organization must establish and maintain an information security incident management process that includes the following activities:
* reporting information security events and weaknesses;
* assessing and deciding on information security events;
* responding to information security incidents;
* learning from information security incidents;
* collecting evidence and disclosing information.
Therefore, a nonconformity (NC) can be identified if the terminology of the incident management reporting process is unclear, as evidenced by the staff misunderstanding of the meaning of "weakness, event, and incident". This could lead to inconsistent or inaccurate reporting, assessment, response, learning, and disclosure of information security incidents, which could affect the information security performance and the effectiveness of the ISMS.
Reference:
* ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clauses 7.2, 9.1, and Annex A controls A.5.24 and A.6.3
* [PECB Candidate Handbook ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor], pages 15-16, 18-19, 22-23
* ISO/IEC 27035-1:2016, clauses 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8
* ISO 27001 - Annex A.16: Information Security Incident Management
* ISO 27001:2022 Annex A Control 5.24 - What's New?
NEW QUESTION # 150
場景 7：Webvue 是一家總部位於日本的科技公司，專注於電腦軟體的開發、支援和維護。 Webvue 為各個技術領域和商業行業提供解決方案。其旗艦服務是 CloudWebvue，這是一個提供儲存、網路和虛擬運算服務的綜合雲端運算平台，專為企業和個人用戶設計。 CloudWebvue 以其靈活性、可擴展性和可靠性而聞名。
Webvue 決定僅將 CloudWebvue 納入其 ISO/IEC 27001 認證範圍。因此，第一階段和第二階段的審核同時進行。 Webvue 以其對資產保密性的嚴格控製而自豪。他們使用適當的加密控制措施來保護儲存在 CloudWebvue 中的資訊。任何級別的信息，無論是內部使用、受限還是機密，都會先使用唯一的哈希值進行加密，然後再儲存在雲端。審核團隊由五人組成：Keith、Sean、Layla、Sam 和 Tina。 Keith 是 IT 和資訊安全審核團隊中最有經驗的審核員，擔任審核團隊負責人。他的職責包括規劃審核和管理審核團隊。 Sean 和 Layla 在專案規劃、業務分析和 IT 系統(硬體和應用)方面經驗豐富。他們的任務包括根據 Webvue 的內部系統和流程製定審計計劃。另一方面，Sam 和 Tina 近期完成了學業，負責完成日常工作，同時提升他們的審計技能。在透過與相關人員訪談驗證是否符合 ISO/IEC 27001 附錄 A 中關於密碼學使用 8.24 控制項的要求時，稽核團隊發現，加密金鑰最初是基於隨機位元產生器 (RGB) 和其他加密金鑰產生最佳實務產生的。在查閱 Webvue 的加密策略後，他們得出結論，訪談中獲得的資訊屬實。然而，由於該策略沒有規定加密金鑰的使用和生命週期，這些加密金鑰仍在繼續使用。
根據Webvue與認證機構後來達成的協議，審核團隊選擇進行虛擬審核，重點驗證Webvue是否符合ISO/IEC 27001標準中的8.11項控制要求－資料脫敏，以符合認證範圍和審核目標。他們審查了CloudWebvue內部的資料保護流程，並專注於該公司如何遵守其政策和監管標準。作為審核流程的一部分，審核團隊負責人Keith截取了相關文件和加密金鑰管理程式的螢幕截圖，以記錄和分析Webvue實務的有效性。
Webvue 使用產生的測試資料進行測試。然而，根據與品質保證部門經理的訪談以及該部門的流程，有時也會使用即時系統資料。在這種情況下，雖然會產生大量數據，但也能獲得更準確的結果。測試資料受到保護和控制，這一點已透過 Webvue 人員在審計期間模擬加密過程得到驗證。在與品質保證部門經理訪談時，Keith 發現安全培訓部門的員工沒有遵循正確的流程，儘管該部門不在審計範圍內。儘管安全訓練部門不在稽核範圍內，但其不合規行為可能會對稽核範圍內的流程產生潛在影響，尤其會影響 CloudWebvue 的資料安全和加密實務。因此，Keith 將此發現納入審計報告，並已告知受審計方。
根據以上情景，回答以下問題：
問題：
在虛擬審計過程中，Keith 對 Webvue 的文件是否做出了正確的決定？
- A. 不，虛擬審計期間完全不允許截圖。
- B. 是的，無需事先許可即可截取文件副本的螢幕截圖，前提是審計過程不被錄製。
- C. 不，因為他應該在截取文件螢幕截圖之前獲得許可。
Answer: C
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
* B. Correct answer:
* ISO 19011:2018 mandates that auditors must obtain permission before making copies of documents.
* Virtual audits must adhere to confidentiality agreements to protect sensitive data.
* A. Incorrect:
* Screenshots cannot be taken without permission, even if the audit is not recorded.
* C. Incorrect:
* Screenshots are allowed with prior authorization, ensuring proper data handling.
Relevant Standard Reference:
* ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.4.10 (Virtual Auditing and Data Handling)
NEW QUESTION # 151
哪個是將三元組黏合在一起的黏合劑
- A. 協作
- B. 技術
- C. 人
- D. 行程
Answer: B
Explanation:
The triad refers to the three elements of information security: confidentiality, integrity and availability3. Technology is the glue that ties the triad together, as it provides the means to implement various controls and measures to protect information from unauthorized access, modification or loss3. Reference: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Training Course - BSI
NEW QUESTION # 152
選出最能完整描述審計結果的句子的單字。
Answer:
Explanation:
NEW QUESTION # 153
身為 ISMS 審核小組組長，您正在代表一家線上零售商對一家國際物流公司進行第二方審核。在審核期間，您的一名團隊成員報告了與 ISO/IEC 27001:2022 附錄 A 的控制措施 5.18（存取權限）相關的不合格項。她發現證據表明，刪除過去 3 個月內離開的 20 名人員的伺服器存取協議需要長達 1 週的時間，而政策要求在他們離開後 24 小時內刪除存取權限。
用最好的單字填寫句子，勾選要填寫的空白部分，使其以紅色突出顯示，然後從下面的選項中點擊適用的文字。或者，您可以將該選項拖曳到適當的空白部分。
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
The purpose of including access rights in an information management system to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 is to provide, review, modify and remove these permissions in accordance with the organisation' s policy and rules for access control.
Access rights are the permissions granted to users or groups of users to access, use, modify, or delete information assets. Access rights should be aligned with the organisation's access control policy, which defines the objectives, principles, roles, and responsibilities for managing access to information systems.
Access rights should also follow the organisation's rules for access control, which specify the criteria, procedures, and controls for granting, reviewing, modifying, and revoking access rights. The purpose of including access rights in an information management system is to ensure that only authorised users can access information assets according to their business needs and roles, and to prevent unauthorised or inappropriate access that could compromise the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of information assets. References:
* ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A Control 5.181
* ISO/IEC 27002:2022 Control 5.182
* CQI & IRCA Certified ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) Training Course3
NEW QUESTION # 154
場景3：NightCore是一家總部位於美國的跨國科技公司，專注於電子商務、雲端運算、數位串流媒體和人工智慧。在實施資訊安全管理系統 (ISMS) 8 個多月後，他們聘請了認證機構進行第三方審核，以獲得 ISO/IEC 27001 認證。
認證機構成立了一個由七名審核員組成的團隊。傑克是最有經驗的審核員，被任命為審核組組長。多年來，他獲得了許多知名認證，例如 ISO/IEC 27001 首席審核員、CISA、CISSP 和 CISM。
Jack 透過研究和評估 NightCore 實施的每項資訊安全要求和控制，對 ISMS 審查的每個階段進行了全面分析。在第二階段審核期間。傑克發現了一些不合格項。在將購買的軟體許可證發票數量與軟體庫存進行比較後，傑克發現該公司的許多電腦一直在使用非法版本的軟體。他決定要求高階主管對這項違規行為做出解釋，看看他們是否意識到這一點。他的下一步是審計 NightCore 的 IT 部門。高層指派 NightCore 的系統管理員 Tom 擔任指導，陪伴 Jack 和稽核團隊了解系統和數位資產基礎設施的內部運作。
在採訪財務部的一名成員時，審計人員發現該公司最近向其一名顧問進行了一些不尋常的大額交易。收集有關交易的所有必要詳細資訊後。傑克決定直接訪問高階主管。
在討論第一個不合格項時，高階主管告訴傑克，他們願意決定使用複製軟體而不是原始軟體，因為它更便宜。 Jack向NightCore的高層解釋說，使用非法版本的軟體違反了ISO/IEC 27001和國家法律法規的要求。然而，他們似乎對此感到滿意。
在審計幾個月後，Jack 將他在審計期間收集的一些 NightCore 資訊出售給了 NightCore 的競爭對手，以獲取巨額資金。
根據該場景，回答以下問題：
當傑克發現有關軟體的第一個不合格項時，他收集了哪些類型的審核證據？請參閱場景 3。
- A. 分析證據
- B. 數學證據
- C. 口頭證據
Answer: B
Explanation:
Jack collected mathematical evidence when he identified nonconformities by comparing the number of purchased invoices for software licenses with the software inventory. This type of evidence involves numerical, quantifiable data that highlights discrepancies and supports findings of compliance or non- compliance.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2013 Standard, general guidelines on auditing
NEW QUESTION # 155
完成第一階段並準備第二階段初步認證審核後，受審核方通知審核小組負責人，他們希望擴大審核範圍，以包括該組織最近收購的另外兩個場所。
考慮到這些訊息，您希望審計小組負責人採取什麼行動？
- A. 取得附加網站的資訊以通知認證機構
- B. 通知審核方可以接受請求，但必須重複完整的第一階段審核
- C. 安排使用視訊會議平台完成兩個站點的遠端第一階段審核
- D. 增加第 2 階段審核的長度以包含額外的站點
Answer: A
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 17021-1, which specifies the requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems, a certification body should establish criteria for determining audit time and audit team composition based on factors such as the scope of certification, size and complexity of the organization, risks associated with its activities, etc2. Therefore, if an auditee requests to extend the audit scope to include two additional sites after completing Stage 1 of an initial certification audit, the audit team leader should obtain information about the additional sites to inform the certification body, so that they can review and approve the change in scope and adjust the audit time and audit team accordingly2. The other options are not appropriate actions for the audit team leader to take in this situation. For example, increasing the length of the Stage 2 audit to include the extra sites without informing the certification body may violate their procedures and policies; arranging to complete a remote Stage 1 audit of the two sites using a video conferencing platform may not be feasible or effective depending on the nature and location of the sites; and informing the auditee that the request can be accepted but a full Stage 1 audit must be repeated may not be necessary or reasonable if there are no significant changes in the auditee's ISMS since Stage 12. Reference: ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 - Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems - Part 1: Requirements
NEW QUESTION # 156
設想：
當使用者向緩衝區添加的資料超過其儲存容量允許的數量時，資料處理工具就會崩潰。該事件是由於該工具無法進行數組邊界檢查而引起的。這是什麼樣的弱點？
- A. 外部漏洞，即緩衝區溢位漏洞的利用，是由外部因素造成的
- B. 固有脆弱性，即無法進行陣列邊界檢查，是資料處理工具的特性
- C. 無；緩衝區溢位不是一個漏洞；這是一種威脅
Answer: B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
Intrinsic vulnerabilities are inherent flaws in a system, software, or tool. In this case, the inability to bound-check arrays is an inherent weakness of the software, making it an intrinsic vulnerability. This aligns with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A Control A.8.9 (Configuration Management), which mandates secure software design and validation practices.
Extrinsic vulnerabilities arise due to external factors (e.g., misconfigurations or lack of security patches).
Buffer overflow is a vulnerability, not a threat, because it represents a weakness that can be exploited by an attacker.
NEW QUESTION # 157
......
PDF (New 2026) Actual PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Exam Questions: https://www.test4cram.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN_real-exam-dumps.html
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Exam Dumps, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Practice Test Questions: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1VvoZrGWegOAt-iOq1GZCWtloEmpXSgzi